11/10/2022 0 Comments Newtonian reflector telescope![]() ![]() The full moon is about 1/2° wide - so M31 is a lot bigger in apparent size. For example, the Andromeda Galaxy, also known as object 31 in the Messier catalog (M31), has an an angular size of about 3° by 1.5°. The problem with astronomical objects is less one of apparent size (this is a secondary concern, and not unimportant, but not as critical) and more one of brightness. The primary purpose of an astronomical telescope is not to magnify, but to gather light. Please bear with me, I tend to be verbose and try to be thorough (in other words, grab a snack and settle in for the read).įirst of all, let me clear up a common misconception many people who are new to amateur astronomy tend to have. Now, your initial question was about the differences between them. ![]() I would not recommend any telescopes smaller than that, as there's little they can show you that a set of binoculars in the price range wouldn't do just as well or better. Meade makes a 114 mm version, and so does Orion. Both are 130 mm Newtonian telescopes with fairly good optics for their price range and stable mounts. Clubs also have other programs that can help those new to the hobby learn and better enjoy their observing time.Ģ.) The best telescopes I can recommend in the under $200 price range (which is where these seem to be) are the AWB OneSky 130 (also known as the SkyWatcher Heritage 130P outside of the US) or the Meade Lightbridge Mini 130. At such events, you can see a lot of different types of telescopes of all different designs, prices, manufacturers, etc. These are events where those who have them bring out telescopes and everyone spends the evening observing together. They also often conduct frequent star parties. Most clubs offer guidance and advice to new members. In the US, membership usually runs $50 or less per year. ![]() Ok, before I get into the nuts and bolts, let me first offer a couple pieces of advice:ġ.) Join an astronomy club or society. But, due to the poor quality of its mount, it's the better of the bunch. Of the ones you listed, the 114EQ is the least bad choice. First off, I would not recommend any of these telescopes. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |